NewTube

NewTube

Sign In

-30  

-15  

-5  

-1  

+1  

+5  

+15  

+30  




yellowgenius

28

6

911, HAVE YOU SEEN THIS

  - 1:42

911, HAVE YOU SEEN THIS https://twitter.com/MRock2021/status/1569279358551957505


2

0

0

0

0

Share on TwitterShare on Twitter


1,343 Views

Uploaded 3 months ago  

September 14th 2022  

File Size: 2 MB

Category: Health And Wellness







21 Comments

Conspirit

- a day ago  

Um, conspiritor 1 & 2 colabloate. Why? Because normal people dont stand around taking selfies when planes are slamming into tall buildings. Video at 11! Fake video real aircraft.

Volkner

- 3 months ago  

OMG. Making crazy deductions from a very low resolution video. Good Grief. Conspirator 1: "We need to develop a very sophisticated and almost impossible holographic projector system to fake flying airplanes into buildings." Conspirator 2: "Wouldn't it be easier to just use real planes." Conspirator 1: "Then we need to have some airplane parts, like a set of landing gear, to throw to the street below after the fake holographic plane crashes into the building." Conspirator 2: "Why don't we just use real planes? We got plenty of them." Cospirator 1: "Then we have to round up and doctor every single video of the event. No doubt many people will be filming after the first crash, but we've got to catch them all." Cospirator 2: "Uhh, real planes? So much easier and we already have them."

MatthewFerguson

- 3 months ago  

But have you got a human that is intelligent enough to have the skill to fly that plane but stupid enough to willing die for a day's wages.

Volkner

- 3 months ago  

@Matthew Ferguson. Right. I agree. I think it's pretty clear that the aircraft were remotely piloted by computer. There's a video of one of the aircraft making a precision turn moments before striking the tower that not human pilot could have made. But remotely controlled, computer piloted aircraft isn't science fiction, that's technology we have and have had for a while. Giant holographic aircraft that crash into buildings IS science fiction, that's technology that still doesn't exist.

Joshua777

- 3 months ago  

Same people who did this - did the London 7/7 bombing - check 7/7 Ripple Effect : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7PQG5weeHk (note the alleged 4 bombers at the London underground tube station - but the railing is INFRONT of one of them - badly photoshopped and so the 9/11 plane WING. Liars - all lies for fake new world order - which is being built on lies for the god of lies satan and his antichrist pope.

MatthewFerguson

- 3 months ago  

There is another video out there that explains how the layering is done 911-No planes hit the towers http://newtube.app/user/IM_Philinblank/zalNbVz

Joshua777

- 3 months ago  

HAVE SEEN THIS - NEW GAS 2.5 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas discovered in Cyprus = gas probs solved: https://cyprus-mail.com/2022/08/22/significant-gas-discovery-in-cyprus-block-6/

Heathbar

- 3 months ago  

Old one but a good one thank you

Shoah_Kahn

- 3 months ago  

Boaz and Jachin; King Solomon; and Edom will fall.

Joshua777

- 3 months ago  

knockout!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

💤Zzz💤

- 3 months ago  

Satinist

marru59

- 3 months ago  

9/11 same autore as J.F.K. Deep state.

MatthewFerguson

- 3 months ago  

It is not the same. This one is as simple as " NO PLANES"

Pawking1

- 3 months ago  

When you zoom in at 16-18 secs the "wing behind the building" effect is not there. So either whoever zoomed/cropped in later in the clip screwed up or faked it deliberately. There is reason why most courts in most of the world's jurisdictions do not allow digitally altered video footage as evidence. Simply put: shit happens. a) a shot not filmed in super slo-mo slowed down that much will do weird shit because the software fills gaps. b) if you then "zoom in", i. e. crop and enlarge, shit gets even weirder. c) if "they" pull off some sort of holographic 3d projection on an epic scale that makes 1000s of people from 1000s of angles see a 3d plane in perfect sync with a missile (?) and/or charges inside the building... I don't know... they wouldn't have missed that bit? What about footage from another angle?

Volkner

- 3 months ago  

Exactly! Why go through all that trouble to R&D some futuristic holo-projection system on that kind of scale, when you already have access to as many real planes as you want? This is all stupidness being spread by people who can't reason or think critically.

SimpltDifficult

- 3 months ago  

CGI wasn't that good back then.!!! 911 was an inside JOB.!!!

Volkner

- 3 months ago  

... an inside job with real planes.

MatthewFerguson

- 3 months ago  

If Volkner can get you to retain an ounce of belief that planes were involved ,he will have stopped you from giving a resounding " there were no planes! " and so once again the dupe continues.

Volkner

- 2 months ago  

@MatthewFerguson Too! Many! People! Saw! Planes! ... and the technology to do that holographically DOES! NOT! EXIST! ... and why would that? Seriously, answer that!! Why would they? Why would they go through all that much trouble to R&D technology that far-fetched when they have a virtually unlimited supply of real planes? You've either lost the ability to reason and to think critically, or you are deliberately trying to deceive people.

MatthewFerguson

- 2 months ago  

There were NO PLANES

MatthewFerguson

- 2 months ago  

Just accept the evidence of this production. If NO PLANES goes viral it will destroy all trust in TV media.